Change of Location for March Meeting – One Time Only

Our normal venue is going through environmental remediation work, so we’re moving our March 6 meeting to the La Mesa Adult Enrichment Center (known to many as the Senior Center), which is at the corner of La Mesa Blvd. and University Avenue. That’s a short hop from our usual location at the La Mesa Community Center, across the street from the Little League field at the base of the hill leading up to the Community Center.

The address for our March 6 meeting is 8450 La Mesa Blvd., La Mesa, CA 91942.

There is ample parking in the large Little League lot, with a short walk across University Ave. to the Senior Center. Also, there are a few limited parking spaces right next to the Senior Center, for those needing disabled parking or a shorter walk.

Our meeting will begin at its usual time, with a 6:30 social period, general meeting starting right at 7 PM. We’ll still have snacks, beverages and desserts to share for all attendees.

Our guest speakers are Assemblymember Lorena Gonzalez-Fletcher, San Diego mayoral candidate Cory Briggs, developer Ginger Hitzke and moderator Scott Lewis, editor in chief of the Voice of San Diego. Our program will be a lively discussion about affordable housing, NIMBYs vs. YIMBYs, the prospect of building dense housing around transit and public transportation hubs, and of course the ramifications of meeting our adopted and mandated Climate Action Plan goals. Find out more.

See you Wednesday night, March 6th at the La Mesa Senior Center. And starting in April we’ll be back at our usual location.

Senior Moments or Alzheimer’s?

Linda K. Armacost, Ed.D, Secretary and Past President, La Mesa-Foothills Democratic Club

“I often hear people say that a person suffering from Alzheimer’s is not the person they knew. I wonder to myself – Who are they then?” – Bob DeMarco

I have “senior moments” where I can’t remember a name or a movie or what I was just talking about. I guess we all have memory glitches from time to time, but are the glitches just symptoms of an aging brain, or the harbingers of Alzheimer’s?

Among the many diseases and conditions we worry about as we age, including cancer, heart disease, arthritis and cataracts, Alzheimer’s is the most terrifying to me. To lose one’s mind and sense of self seems to me the worst thing that can happen. And, once stricken, there is no cure, just a slow insidious slide into oblivion. There is no vaccine to prevent the disease, and no meaningful medications yet.

Now, I admit to being a worrywart, a holdover from being a mother perhaps, and now I worry about my brain. If diagnosed, I believe I would choose death with dignity and skip the pain, expense, and trauma on my loved ones. I could create an advance directive – but what if I forget that I did it? What if my family disagrees? Am I over-reacting?

I am right to worry. “An Alzheimer’s epidemic is coming. Here’s how to prepare,” warns Maria Shiver, California’s former First Lady. “Every 65 seconds in the United States a new brain develops Alzheimer’s. Two-thirds of them belong to women, and no one know why that is. For a women over 60, the risk of developing Alzheimer’s at some point in her lifetime is twice as great as that of developing breast cancer. People of color are also at a greater risk for the disease.”

What can I do? When I forget a name or movie or whatever, my first instinct is to reach for my phone and Google, but I don’t. First reason is I still haven’t figured out my new Android phone (I hate it but that’s another story) and second, I want to try to remember on my own.

There are steps I can take to help fight against Alzheimer’s:

1. Keep learning – lots of reading, researching, and writing. I could do more, like learn a foreign language.

2. Daily exercise. I do pretty well: walking, gardening, house work. I could do more.

3. Cultivate relationships. I am so lucky to know many wonderful people though the Club.

4. Go to college. I got my Ed.D at 60. I guess that counts.

5. Have hobbies. Check. Reading, gardening, trying to figure out how to get rid of Agent Orange (ok, maybe not a hobby but I spend a lot of time on it).

6. Keep a healthy weight. Check.

7. Control your health numbers. If that means blood pressure and cholesterol, good. If it means the high cost of prescriptions and dental care, screwed.

Next worry: Can I inherit Alzheimer’s? Extensive research has linked the early-onset form of Alzheimer’s to genetics. Great! No relatives with early-onset! Then, I read Dr. John Growdon, MD from Harvard who writes, “When a family member has Alzheimer’s disease, people often wonder about their own chances of developing the disease. Family history is indeed a risk factor for Alzheimer’s.”

Growdon continues, “If you have a parent or sibling with Alzheimer’s, you’re more likely to develop the disease than someone who does not have a first-degree relative with this condition. Risk rises further if you have more than one first-degree relative with Alzheimer’s. But while heredity is a major factor in a small number of families, for most people, genetics seem to play only a minor role or none at all. As scientists continue to mine new research on genes associated with late-onset Alzheimer’s, though, our current understanding may shift.”

My Dad was diagnosed with senile dementia at 93. There is a razor’s edge difference between senile dementia and Alzheimer’s, and both are horrific. My mom died at 66 (a miracle really, she was sick her whole life and was not expected to live past 50) and had no mental disabilities. My future mental fitness may depend on a roll of the hereditary dice.

My worries are nothing compared to the Alzheimer’s epidemic we Californians are facing. “In California, we have more people living with Alzheimer’s than in any other state…. We talk a lot about preparing for the next huge earthquake, but Alzheimer’s is another ‘Big One’ facing California, and we just aren’t sufficiently prepared,” says Shriver. Governor Newsom has added some $3 million to support state research, and established a task force on Alzheimer’s prevention and preparedness. More preparation is needed says Shriver: “In California, the number of people with Alzheimer’s is projected to soar by nearly a third in just the next six years. California has the benefit of 10 Alzheimer’s Disease Centers, more than any other state…. And now, we also have a bold new governor who watched his father grapple with dementia is his final months”.

Federal Legislation that would provide universal healthcare is being rolled out by Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.): “The Medicare for All Act of 2019 … would create a government-run single-payer health system even more generous than the current Medicare program. Her office hasn’t publicly released the details of the upcoming measure, but Democratic members told me it would cover long-term care and mental health services, two areas where Medicare coverage is sparse.”

MARCH MEETING: Affordable Housing in San Diego – NIMBYs vs. YIMBYs

Join us for our monthly meeting March 6, where we’ll tackle the issue of affordable housing in San Diego with three great speakers – San Diego Mayoral Candidate Cory Briggs, real estate developer Ginger Hitzke, and Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzales (D-80). The moderator is Scott Lewis, editor in chief of the Voice of San Diego.

UPDATE: We’re meeting at a special location, one time only, the La Mesa Adult Enrichment Center, known to many as the Senior Center, 8450 La Mesa Blvd, La Mesa, at the corner of La Mesa Blvd. and University Avenue. Scroll to the bottom of this post for more information about the venue and parking.

Briggs is a popular advocate of open government, environmental protection and women’s rights. His platform includes fighting Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s initiative to waive height restrictions and other regulations for housing developments near transit centers. The mayor frames these initiatives as helping the city meet Climate Action Plan goals by building dense housing near public transit – therefore reducing reliance on cars. But Briggs things it’s all just a favor for the Republican Mayor’s developer friends and supporters.

Journalist Michael Smolens writes: “Briggs said more transit needs to be planned and built before any residential-building binge. He added that he would support a general hotel-tax increase — which would be subject to a simple majority vote — to help finance transit and affordable housing. He also said developers should not be allowed to pay into a housing fund instead of including affordable units in their projects, an idea under consideration at City Hall.”

So where does this put conscientious developers that truly are building and planning units to provide access for first time home buyers to buy affordable housing? What about the fact that a majority of San Diegans cannot afford to purchase housing within acceptable commuting distance to their jobs? What about the many progressive politicians that are listing affordable housing, public transit and climate action goals near the top of their campaign promises? These questions and more will be discussed at our March 6 meeting.

Also joining our panel is Ginger Hitzke, President of Hitzke Development, a real estate development company specializing in in-fill, redevelopment, transit-oriented, mixed-use, eco-friendly affordable housing. Ginger has her own affordable housing story, and her past experiences have shaped her current opinions, as well as her career goals, philanthropy, interests and many accomplishments.

Hitzke is a first-generation real estate developer and has 23 years of experience in the field of affordable housing development. She has participated in the development of over 1,500 apartments and affordable homes totaling more than $430 million in real estate activity throughout California. After serving as Vice President of Development for Affirmed Housing Group, she formed Hitzke Development. She specializes in the development of affordable rental housing (including permanent supportive housing) on infill, transit-oriented sites.

Ginger is an active member of the communities that she serves, including Circulate San Diego (president-elect), San Diego Housing Federation, Leadership for Urban Renewal Network, and the Boys and Girls Clubs of San Marcos. She currently lives in Temecula, California with her husband, 20 year retired enlisted Navy veteran, Eric, their 24- and 14-year-old sons and their 7 cats and dogs.

Assemblywoman Gonzales is a late – and welcome! – addition to our lineup. She was elected in 2013, fighting for the state’s working and middle classes. She authored legislation helping 6.5 million Californians earn paid sick leave, making California the first state in the nation to guarantee earned sick days for every private sector worker regardless of employer size or sector. She’s fought for automatic voter registration, parents’ rights, grocery workers, immigrants, and more.

Our large and active Club represents the communities of San Carlos, Allied Gardens, Del Cerro, La Mesa, College Area, Santee, Mt. Helix, Casa de Oro and Spring Valley and other close by areas.

IMPORTANT: Note the new, one-time location for the March meeting: The La Mesa Adult Enrichment Center (known to many as the Senior Center), at the corner of La Mesa Blvd. and University Avenue. That’s a short hop from our usual location at the La Mesa Community Center, across the street from the Little League field at the base of the hill leading up to the Community Center.

The address for our March 6 meeting is 8450 La Mesa Blvd., La Mesa, CA 91942.

There is ample parking in the large Little League lot, with a short walk across University Ave. to the Senior Center. Also, there are a few limited parking spaces right next to the Senior Center, for those needing disabled parking or a shorter walk.

Our meeting will begin at its usual time, with a 6:30 social period, general meeting starting 7 PM. We’ll still have snacks, beverages and desserts to share for all attendees.

The reason for the change is that the Community Center, where we usually meet, is doing environmental remediation.

We meet the first Wednesday of each month and beginning in April we’ll be back at the usual location, at the spacious La Mesa Community Center, 4975 Memorial Dr, just north of University Ave. in La Mesa. Our meetings start with our 6:30 PM social time (featuring salads, snacks, desserts and beverages supplied by the club and its members) and 7 PM meeting and program. Please join us as a guest or become a member, with our modest annual dues starting at $30.

Women are Closing One Gender Gap – and It’s Killing Them!

By Linda K. Armacost, Ed.D.

Secretary, La Mesa-Foothills Democratic Club

“Women are responding to stress in ways that are closing the longstanding gaps between men and women when it comes to self-harm, substance abuse and risk-taking behavior.” So says a recent edition of the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Drug overdose deaths among American women have more than tripledsince 1999, according Melissa Healy writing in the LA Times.

The research shows a frightening increase in fatal drug overdoses for women between 30 and 64, and there was a five-fold increase of drug deaths for women aged 55-64. A shocking 80% rise in suicides among women 45-64 since the turn of the century was also reported. The sharp increase in prescription opioids has contributed to the increases, however, heroin and benzodiazepines also rose sharply as did overdoses from cocaine and antidepressants. The average age of death from drug overdose is 46.5.

The CDC Report does not draw conclusions about the shocking increases in drug fatalities, only recommends healthcare providers pay attention to women around midlife.

I believe there are two major factors at work here: 1. the ubiquity of powerful drugs that are over-prescribed. 2. Healthcare providers not recognizing the symptoms of the menopause phase, and a failure to treat those symptoms.

As women approach mid-life, societal pressures begin to increase. It is a time when women are working to improve their careers and social status, many women are still raising children, and some find themselves in the
sandwich” generation, where they are caring for aging parents and children. While societal attitudes towards ”older” women are improving, women are still trying to overcome aging with plastic surgery, liposuction, frenzied workouts, and special age-defying diets. This is also the age when the menopause process begins.

I describe menopause as puberty in reverse. Puberty floods the adolescent brain and body with powerful hormones. These hormones prepare bodies for adulthood. Puberty can cause erratic emotional behavior, changes in sleeping patterns, and accelerated growth.

The journey toward menopause begins in the late 30’s and early 40’s as our hormone levels begin to diminish. Erratic emotions, sleep problems, foggy thinking, and unwanted weight gain are often attributed to outside pressures by women. To deal with these new problems, many women seek medical assistance for depression and anxiety believing this will relieve their symptoms.

15 years ago, my dissertation was published (Menogogy: The Art and Science of becoming a Crone: Changing perspectives on women, aging, and Adult Education). Iexhorted healthcare providers and adult educators to recognize the menopause process and its importance. The dissertation included a section on the patriarchal takeover of religion, medicine, and education. I also argue that the end of the menopause process is a discrete phase of adult development. Human women are unique among primates because they can spend a third of their lives in a state of infertility. “In a recent review of primate species, researchers found that humans are the only primates that don’t die within a few years of “’fertility cessation.”

I also conducted a qualitative study of nine women (I called them WOWmen)) ranging in age from 45 to 66, who were in perimenopause, menopause, post menopause, and one had surgical menopause. Their stories reinforce why it is critical for healthcare providers to understand menopause. My son graduated from medical school in 1997, the first year menopause was added to the curriculum!

Menopause can be challenging and rewarding depending where you are on the journey. The study revealed some common themes; changes in their bodies were upsetting, weight gain and graying hair for example. Increased emotionality and changes in sexual desire, “When I started crying during dog food commercials, I knew something was happening”, “There was a time when offered a banana split, or sex with my lover….ice cream won”.

The ‘happiest’ women in the study was also the oldest, Barbara at 66 who said; “This is the best time of life”. Which makes the increase in suicides for women 50-60 all the more tragic.

I don’t think that increased awareness of menopause by healthcare providers will prevent drug overdoses, there is no simplistic solution. It is up to women to understand what is going on in their bodies, there are literally hundreds of books about menopause out there. Do not fear menopause, embrace it! I close with a quote from Ursula LeGuin:

“The woman…must become pregnant with herself at last. She must bear herself, her third self, her old age with travail and alone. Not many will help her with that birth. It may well be easier to die if you have already given birth to others or yourself, at least once before. This would be an argument for going through all the discomfort and embarrassment of becoming a Crone. Anyhow it seems a pity to have a built-in rite of passage and to dodge it, evade it, and pretend nothing has changed. That is to dodge and evade one’s womanhood, to pretend one’s like a man. Men, once initiated, never get the second chance. They never change again. That’s their loss, not ours. Why borrow poverty”?

Being a Manly Man Can Hurt You: New Thinking about the Effects of Patriarchy

By Linda K. Armacost, Ed.D

Women have suffered under the hegemony of patriarchy for centuries. For my dissertation, I wrote about the patriarchal takeover of religion, medicine, and education. Turns out patriarchy is not only bad for women, it harms men as well.

For decades, the traditional masculine stereotype of say, John Wayne, was thought to guarantee men happiness and respect. In fact, being a manly man may lead to depression and loneliness. The American Psychological Association (APA) for the first time ever, released guidelines to help psychologists work with men and boys. For decades, The APA has focused exclusively on white men and some questioned the necessity for new guidelines. The APA, new guidelines were developed over 13 years and used four decades of work.

Ronald Levant, who was the APA President when the guidelines were initially conceived, and who has worked on them ever since said: “We found incredible evidence that the extent to which men strongly endorse those [masculine] beliefs, it’s strongly associated with negative outcomes.” Men who rely on stoicism and self-reliance have limited tools for coping, which can lead to self-destructive and violence. It almost makes me feel bad — almost.

Make no mistake, men still dominate professionally and politically: “As of 2018, 95. 2 percent of chief operating officers at Fortune 500 companies were men…. 80 percent of all high-ranking executives were male … the 115th Congress (2017) were 81 percent male.”

But the news isn’t all rosy for men; “Men commit 90 percent of homicides….and represent 77 percent of the homicide victims” [APA E Corner, Stephanie Pappas, January 2019, Vol. 50 no.1 p.34]. Suicide rates for men are higher than women and their life expectancy is nearly five years shorter than women. Boys are diagnosed with ADD more than girls and face more punishment, especially boys of color.

The new guidelines represent a paradigm shift in the APA’s treatment of men and boys. Of course, some traditionalists will rebel and fall back on the real reason men are hurting … women. Some men think a better solution would be to ‘fix’ women and stop them from taking their jobs and complaining about sexual advances!

To be clear, I really like most men and think they are wonderful. I do also agree with Margaret Atwood’s observation; “Men are afraid women will laugh at them, women are afraid men will kill them.”

Further reading: The men who hold onto notions of ‘traditional masculinity’ suffer the most

MARK YOUR CALENDAR: Next Meeting 2/6 With Local Radio Personality Ted Leitner

Ted will join us Wednesday evening Feb. 6; the longtime sports personality and talk radio host will talk sports, politics and more in a freestyle evening. Join us 6:30 pm for socializing and 7 pm for programming at the La Mesa Community Center, 4975 Memorial Drive, La Mesa, CA.

Leitner has been the voice of the San Diego Padres for 39 years, as well as the voice of SDSU Aztec football and basketball. He’s also called games for the Chargers, Philadelphia Eagles, San Diego Clippers and many other teams.

He was nightly sports anchor for KFMB-TV, and also hosted a non-sports radio talk show where he opined freely on politics and butted heads with a conservative program director and fellow talk show host Mark Larson.

Leitner peppers his stream-of-consciousness broadcast style with anecdotes about Ray Charles, Mickey Mantle and Jerry Lewis.

Read more about Ted in this 2017 profile in the San Diego Union-Tribune — and come see him in person Feb. 6!

The Kids Are NOT All Right

By Linda K. Armacost, Ed.D

Secretary, La Mesa-Foothills Democratic Club Board

Before his fall from grace, Democratic Presidential candidate John Edwards spoke of two Americas, one rich and one poor. America’s economic inequality has gone from a gap to a chasm in the intervening years. To understand the consequences of income inequality, we can look at public education.

If I told you about a school district where 40% of the junior high students receive free lunch, can’t afford textbooks, and has passed only two school bond measures since 1989, you might think I was talking about an inner-city school district with people of color and English as a second language. Nope, the school I am referring to is 90% white and in rural America. What happens to the kids in poor, rural communities should trouble us all.

My brother-in-law, Terry, made a surprise visit last weekend and what he told us was absolutely frightening. Terry is a seventh grade teacher in a small Ohio town south of Cincinnati along the Ohio River. Terry left a job in industry, went to college and earned his BA and a Master’s in Education.  Terry loves teaching and his students have consistently scored above state norms. After teaching for 15 years, Terry said, “I don’t think I can do this anymore. It has become nearly impossible to be an effective teacher today.” He went on to explain that his students don’t care about learning and their parents and guardians don’t either. Teacher/parent conference slots used to be filled, but last year only three slots were taken out of 55 students. Terry may retire early from the profession he loves.

What happened? Long-term poverty. When the manufacturing plants left town, the ripple effect of those job losses spread throughout the county. Small towns long the Ohio River, once dotted with nightclubs, restaurants, and boat rentals, have vanished. Jobs are scarce and wages are low. 40% of Terry’s students receive free lunches because they are at or below the poverty level. May students live with a grandparent or another relative because mom and/or dad are in jail, or are victims of the rampant opioid crisis. Some parents have simply left town.

Poor people don’t have good schools because most educational districts depend on property taxes for funding. Terry’s town has only passed two schools bond since 1989. Terry is the ONLY teacher who still uses textbooks — which he buys! Teachers use YouTube instead of textbooks. Terry’s room is the ONLY room with maps! Kids come to his class having never seen or read a map, “You cannot teach Social Studies without a map!” he says.

Terry’s decision is heartbreaking for so many reasons. He is a natural, gifted and creative teacher. When he taught science, his students made hovercrafts out of wooden discs (I rode one). As a Social Studies teacher, his students created costumes fitting the time and countries they were studying, such as the Roman Empire. Terry and his wife, Betty, have a property filled with ancient artifacts and students are invited to their home to explore the creek bed for samples of ancient ferns and small fish. To lose someone like Terry is not only a shame, it is shameful and if the President and Secretary of Education’s 2019 Education Budget passes things will only get worse:

Today, President Donald Trump and Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos released their proposed budget for the 2019 fiscal year. The Trump administration’s budget proposal for this year makes strikingly similar drastic cuts to the administration’s fiscal year 2018 proposal, which represented the most devastating funding cuts to the U.S. Department of Education since Ronald Reagan’s presidency. On the heels of that widely criticized proposal, the Trump administration has doubled down this year with a $7.1 billion cut to the Department of Education’s funding—a 10.5 percent decrease from 2017 levels. And while an unusual addendum—released on the same day as the original proposal—seems to restore $3.3 billion to the education budget, Trump and DeVos have made their priorities clear: Starve public schools to fund private school schemes that benefit the wealthy.

There may be hope on the horizon now that Democrats are in control of the House of Representatives, however, WE citizens must fight for education. When I ran for the school board eons ago, my slogan was “an investment in education today will pay huge dividends in the future.” Another favorite slogan is “if you think education is costly, try ignorance!”

For more check out this link (thanks to Gene Carpentier).

Make Your Voice Heard in the California State Democratic Party

Local delegates are important voices in shaping the direction fo the California Democratic Party. Delegates are elected from each assembly district in the state every two years. The next round of election meetings is coming in January. Here’s what you need to know if you’re interested in voting in delegate selection.

The meetings where delegates are selected are called Assembly District Election Meetings or ADEMs. Each Assembly District elects 14 people to represent them as delegates to the California Democratic Party’s annual convention. These delegates are also known as members of the Democratic State Central Committee. They vote on Party endorsements, resolutions, internal leadership elections and other matters. Many participate in CDP committees and caucuses.

ADEMs will be held throughout the state on two upcoming weekends:

Sat.-Sun., Jan. 12–13

Sat.-Sun, Jan. 26–27, 2019. Details for San Diego districts are below.

At each meeting, seven “self-identified female” and seven “other than self-identified female” delegates will be elected. Voters will also elect one person from that group of 14 to represent that district as a member of the CDP Executive Board, who is expected to attend additional meetings around the state each year to vote on State Party business.

The regular spring convention will be May 31-June 2 in San Francisco, with a second convention likely in November due to the early primary election in March 2020..

Who can run?

The deadline to register was Dec. 27. Anyone who is a registered Democrat residing in the Assembly District they are running for on or before October 22, 2018, can run to be a delegate through their ADEM. Look up your Assembly District here, with your registered voting address: http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/.

You can get more information, including a list of who’s running, here: https://www.cadem.org/our-party/adem.

Who can participate in the meetings?

Anybody can attend the ADEM and vote if they are Democrats residing in that ADEM’s Assembly District, and registered to vote there, as of the data of the meeting. Same-day voter registration is allowed for otherwise qualified citizens.

At each meeting, candidates may give one-minute speeches 30 minutes prior to registration. After registration opens, participants will vote by secret ballot and can then leave at any time. Registration will close two hours after opening, and then votes will be tallied and results announced.

When and where are the meetings?

AD 71
When: Saturday, January 12 from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Where: El Cajon Public Library, 201 East Douglas Avenue, El Cajon, CA 92020
Convener: Bonnie Price (619) 741–6811

AD 77
When: Sunday, January 27 from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Where: IBEW, 7444 Trade Street, San Diego, CA 92121
Convener: Cody Petterson (858) 922–7593

AD 78
When: Sunday, January 13 from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Where: Musicians Association of San Diego County, 1717 Morena Blvd., San Diego, CA 92110
Convener: Rafael Perez (619) 301–5111

AD 79
When: Saturday, January 26 from 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Where: Johnson Elementary School, 1355 Kelton Road, San Diego, CA 92114
Convener: Judy Ki (858) 486–8336**

Meeting January 2: Toni Atkins, President Pro Tempore of the California State Senate

Mark your calendars for a great meeting to start the New Year right — Wednesday, Jan. 2, social at 6:30 pm, programming starts at 7 pm, at the La Mesa Community Center, 4975 Memorial Drive, La Mesa, CA.

We’ll start with a year in review and hear the senator, who represents many of our 500 members, talk about initiatives she put forward in 2018. She’ll concentrate on issues that directly impact her district, the 39th. She’ll give us her take on the future of the stadium property and SDSU’s future expansion into Mission Valley. All of us will be affected in some way by major developments in Mission Valley East, especially the river park, campus expansion, traffic and housing challenges and a new sports stadium.

This past year, we’ve had meetings touching on women’s health and breast cancer, affordable housing, human trafficking, San Diego River conservancy (and the stadium measures), women empowerment in corporate institutions, global climate action, and the homelessness crisis. Atkins has had bills passed and signed on most of these important issues, so to have her discuss her initiatives will be a great follow-up to our previous discussions in these important and relevant areas.

La Mesa Foothills Democratic Club draws members from the communities of Allied Gardens, San Carlos, Del Cerro, the College Area, La Mesa, Mt. Helix, Casa de Oro, Santee and other nearby East County communities. All residents are welcome to attend our monthly meetings which take place on the first Wednesday of each month.

Being Had.

Larry Howe is the Past President who now lives in Italy with his wife Arlene.

Larry Howe, LMFDC Past President

 

As a nation, we are being confronted with the unthinkable reality that a foreign power intentionally injected influence into an election for the Office of the President of the United States. Compounding that issue is the concern as to whether the candidate who won that election knowingly collaborated with a foreign power in that effort or whether that candidate became an unwitting beneficiary.

A third more complex and realistic probability is that Donald Trump became compromised through the exploitation of his own entrepreneurial greed in his business dealings with that foreign power. Then comes the issue of what the result of that compromise might have entailed. The resolution of these critical issues is made more difficult by the seeming unwillingness and incapacity of the Trump enterprise to entertain serious reflection on the consequences of their actions. Self-aggrandizement appears to be the only overarching consideration they can consider.

A proposition could be made that the easiest people to con are greedy opportunists. The exploitation of an opponent’s own weaknesses for use against them is a well-established strategy.  It is beginning to look like the Russians have a gift of a predatory instinct that enables them to spot easy marks to prey upon. And the Russians have used it well against the United States in the undermining of the political process.

            But to what end? In a strategic contest between major world powers, any success in creating instability within the governing structure of a potential adversary works to the benefit of the orchestrator of the instability.  It would be a mistake to underestimate the residual animosity that exists within Russia over the perceived role of the U.S. in encouraging the fall of the Soviet form of government. The U.S. arming and encouraging the Afghani resistance brought the already existing deficits of the Soviet government into sharper focus. And then following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the heavy-handed approach to Russian economic reform taken by the U.S. administration under Ronald Reagan was taken as an attempt to further weaken Russia and ensure U.S. dominance. That was followed by a significant enlargement of NATO incorporating former countries of the Warsaw Pact which Russia saw as a buffer between it and a hostile west. To understand this larger dynamic is to better understand the underlying lingering animosity that orchestrates the Russian well played strategy against the interests of the U.S.

            Emerging evidence demonstrates the carefully executed strategy employed by the Russians to undermine the confidence of the American population in their governmental processes.  To be sure, the Russians recognized the reality that the American political process had already sown the seeds of its own collapse.  The fomenting of extreme political division changed politics from an arena for open debate and collaboration toward the best solutions for the common good to a ‘zero sum – winner takes all’ power contest.  Extremism in various quarters has become the dominant reality in American politics over the past thirty to forty years. And those divisions have only fed on each other resulting in the virtual breakdown of informed, collaborative political dialogue.

            The Russians did not initiate that process in America, we did it to ourselves. But that breakdown in effective political process created the tempting opportunity for the injection of ‘active measures’ to exacerbate the growing crisis of governance in the U.S.

            The growing extremism within the Republican Party fed on the manipulation of legitimate discontent and disappointment of large segments of the U.S. population. Many Americans recognized their government was complicit in the conditions that permitted big money interests to take unreasonable speculative risks and to engineer a cornucopia of bizarre mechanisms to lure the unsuspecting into bogus ‘get-rich-quick schemes’ (i.e. The Derivatives Market).  The outcome was world-wide economic disruption and the loss of significant life savings by so many of us. Added to that, was the further failure of the government to take meaningful, corrective action. Small wonder there is a rampant level of cynicism toward government in the U.S.

            Populism is one of the easiest movements to coopt. The successful demagogue is the one who listens to the anxieties in the population and plays them back to the masses in seeming affirmation and personal identification with their distress. In conditions like that, most people want to feel listened to, “Thank you for understanding I am pissed-off!” The aggrieved are in an elevated emotional state and have neither the inclination nor are they necessarily equipped to evaluate complex issues of economic structural reform necessary to correct the problems. Too often, affirmation of distress is sufficient to get a following. Sound bites, slogans and political stunts carry the day.

            The Republican Presidential Primary illustrated a mad rush to court the Populism sentiment with candidates each trying to appear more ‘anti-establishment’ than the next. Enter Donald Trump. This seventy-year old entrepreneur has existed by sniffing out opportunities to be exploited for his own personal gain. He instinctively gravitates toward market dynamics built on exposure.  Publicity is the meat of entrepreneurial opportunity. Looking for exposure, why not a presidential campaign stage?

            If you were looking for someone to back to be President of the United States who would be the least effective person to have in office and further promote discontent with democracy, from that field, who would you have chosen?  If you wanted to undermine the candidacy of the person with the best experience and best insights into your self-serving objectives, which of the potential candidates would you have wished to undermine?

            It remains to be seen and may never be sufficiently clear the extent to which the Trump campaign knowingly collaborated with Russian efforts to undermine the 2016 presidential election process. Elements of the Trump entourage were courted and enticed into what appeared to be promising commercial opportunities. The reality that they could be compromised in a political context would first have be recognized if they were even open to recognizing it.  A vulnerability of an entrepreneur can be the delusion you are conning the other party more effectively than they are conning you.  Trump was good at it in dealing with contractors working on his properties but dealing with the Russian state apparatus might have injected him into a contest even beyond his guile.

            There is an impression Donald Trump has embedded into our awareness that he is a man seemingly incapable of dealing with his own fallibility.  His inability to control his emotional reflexes and impulses is an extremely worrisome component in a president’s emotional profile. The responsibilities of the President of the United States require a person of calm disposition ready to see world affairs as extremely complex and nuanced. The individual must be able to control impetuosity and must gather around them people with broad depth and perspective who are encouraged to speak truth rather than acting as sycophants.

            Donald Trump is immersed in a swamp of his own creation and is flailing about using elements of the government to attempt to cover and justify his serious errors in judgement revealed in his impetuous pronouncements.   In a recent case in point, whether wittingly or not, to further his own ends he has deliberately weakened the credibility the investigation being conducted by the House Intelligence Committee. By compromising Committee Chair, Devin Nunes, he has cast doubt on the capability of the House of Representatives to impartially protect the interests of the American people.  The Russians could not have done a better job of undermining faith in elements of American democracy.

            On its face, in accomplishing that outcome, Donald Trump has furthered Russian interests. To give him the benefit of doubt, it is likely his own personality deficits are more responsible for that outcome than any orchestration by a hands-on Russian effort.

            And so, it appears in the entire Trump debacle, the personality deficits of Donald Trump have been ready made to be manipulated by a foreign power to their benefit.  Cynicism is growing and distrust of American core governmental functions is being eroded on an almost daily basis.

            The resolution of this crisis is going to require the emergence of true statesmanship coming from some other quarter than the Office of the President. Donald Trump has demonstrated he lacks the depth of personal character to see beyond his own personal aggrandizement to the larger interests of the United States.  The likelihood of his resigning is a fantasy.  His potential removal by Congressional action will be drawn out and messy.  We are in for a very uncertain future in a very complex world. The Russians could not be more satisfied with their efforts in contributing to this outcome.

            We have all been had.  We brought a lot of this on ourselves. Concentrations of financial power in the U.S. were part of the manipulative process that helped con many in the electorate. Narrow political opportunists who have sold out to those concentrations of financial power continue to do their bidding. We offered the Russians a wide-open opportunity to exploit our weaknesses and they took it.

            If there was ever a time to break down political division and have voices of collaborative moderation take charge, it is now.  God protect and defend the United States of America from what we have done to ourselves!